TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (3) TMI 606
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ot complied with the requirement under Section 129E of the Act, as regards, the pre-deposit of the amount in terms of the said provision. 2. The appellant while traveling in a train was intercepted. The case against him appears to be that he was carrying Gold smuggled into India from Bangladesh, and was accompanied with another person also. On conclusion of the proceedings, the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) West Bengal, Kolkata passed a common order, wherein the appellant came to be visited with penalty in a sum of Rs. 75 lakhs. It appears that the other person was also asked to pay penalty. They preferred appeals before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in the year 2017. The Tribunal finding that the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t the deposit of duty and interest demanded or penalty levied would cause under hardship to such person, the Commissioner (Appeals) or, as the case may be, the Appellate Tribunal may dispense with such deposit subject to such conditions as he or it may deem fit to impose so as to safeguard the interests of revenue: Provided further that where an application is filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) for dispensing with the deposit of duty and interest demanded or penalty levied under the first proviso, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall, where it is possible to do so, decide such application within thirty days from the date of its filing." It is thereafter that the present version was inserted with effect from dated 06.08.2014, wh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ending before any appellate authority prior to the commencement of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014.]" 5. The specific argument of the learned counsel for the appellant is that in the case of the appellant in view of the fact that the act relates to the year 2013 (namely on 28.2.2013), the appellant must be governed by Section 129E prior to the substitution. This is for the reason that the substitution of Section 129A was effected on 06.08.2014 which is after the date of the incident (28.02.2013). On the basis of the same, it is contended that under Section 129E, as it stood, prior to the substitution there was a power available with the Appellate Authority in the matter of demand of pre-deposit. He would point out that the amount for pre-d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the requirement is out of proportion to the nature of the requirement itself, and the benefit which the applicant would derive from compliance with it." 8. It is in sharp departure from the previous regime that the new provision has been enacted. Under the new regime, on the one hand, the amount to be deposited to maintain the appeal has been reduced from 100% to 7.5% but the discretion which was made available to the appellate body to scale down the pre-deposit has been taken away. 9. The first proviso of Section 129E of the present Section enacts a limitation on the total amount which can be demanded by way of pre-deposit. The first proviso provides that the amount required to be deposited should not exceed Rs. 10 Crores. In this re....