2022 (2) TMI 618
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....direction directing the respondents to now immediately sanction and release the amount of 20% of the value of the recovery of duties and penalties, as Reward to the petitioners. (B) Be pleased to quash and set aside the order in original dated 23.10.2020 qua the petitioner no.1. (C) Be pleased to stay the operation, implementation and any recovery qua the impugned order in original. (D) Be pleased to pending the issuance of notice and further proceedings of the present petition grant ex-parte ad interim relief in terms of prayer B above. (E) Any other incidental relief's deemed fit and proper may also kindly be granted. 2. It is the case of the writ-applicant no.1 that it is upon the information furnis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....- [Rs.Fifty lakhs only] on Shri Jugal Kishore Palod, Director of M/s. Bhairav Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd., Vamaj, Kadi under sub-rule 1 of Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. (v) I impose a penalty of Rs. 40,00,000/- [Rs.Fourty Lakhs only] on Shri Chandrakant Devilal Sharma, Transport of Goods manufactured by M/s. Bhairav Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd., Vamaj, Kadi under sub-rule 1 of Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. (vi) I impose a penalty of Rs. 25,00,000/- [Rs.Twenty Five Lakhs Only] on M/s. Bikaner Agrico, B-505, 5th Floor, Nirman Complex, Opp. Havmor Restaurant, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad under subrule 1 of Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. (vii) I impose a penalty of Rs. 25,00,000/- [Rs.Twenty Five Lakhs Only....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....td. 4. We have heard Mr. Hasit Dave, the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicants. Mr. Dave vehemently submitted that there was no good ground or reason for the Commissioner to fasten any liability on his client because it is his clients who furnished the necessary information on the strength of which the entire evasion came to the notice of the Department. 5. We take notice of the fact that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner, CGST & CEX, Gandhinagar is an appeal-able order under Section-107 of the C.G.S.T. Act. As a statutory remedy of appeal is available to the writ-applicants, we should not entertain this writ-application. 6. It appears that the present writ-application has been filed only with a view to over....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI