Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (7) TMI 803

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appeal shall be filed within a period of 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated to the applicant. The appellant in this case approached this authority within the time limit. 1. Brief History of the Case: The appellant i.e., Superintendent of Central Tax, Central GST Ravulapalem Range filed an application in Form GST ARA-03 on 29.01.2019 before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh seeking clarification in the case of M/s. Vinayaka Constructions, ubalanka, East Godavari District. M/s. Vinayaka Constructions is a works contractor executing the works awarded by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Panchayat Raj Department, Eluru Circle. The name of works being executed by the applicant is "Reconstruction of the road work "Penugonda to Munamarru" in Penugonda Mandal of Achanta Assembly Constituency, West Godavari District. The scope of the work is clearing and grubbing, stripping excess soil, earthwork, GSB & WMM, BT Prime coat, Tack Coat & BM, CD works BT tack coat, BM, SDBC, CC pavement Shoulders & Road Furniture by mechanical means and disposal of unserviceable materials and stacking of serviceable materi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service; ILLUSTRATION: When reading the above sentences in continuity as below, eligibility/admissibility of ITC may be able to be understood in respect of woks contract service when supplied for construction of immovable Property (other than Plant and machinery) under GST; Input tax credit shall not be available in respect of works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service from the above two sentences, what this office understood that the words "it" and "input service" in the second sentence relates to or speaks about the work "works contract services" in the first sentence. Therefore, in common parlance, as per first sentence, the input tax credit shall not be available in respect of works contract service. However, on harmonious reading the second sentence combining with the first sentence, the eligibility / admissibility of input tax credit may be very clear that receiver of service and sup....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of clauses (c) and (d), the expression "construction" included re-construction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs to the extent of capitalization, to the said immovable property; 5. Upon the study and examination of the provisions of Section 17 (5) (c) and the definition of works contract, the appellant submitted that there are "14" activities for which execution of works contract may be undertaken. However, out of "14", the activity of construction of immovable property (other than plant and machinery) under Section 17 (5) (c) and 17 (5) (d) only is restricted in respect of availment of input tax credit under CGST Act,2017. Therefore, it appears that the Govt. of India had taken care of providing input tax credit benefits to the GST Credit aspirants very cautiously, in all respects. Therefore, it appears that the Govt. of India would not have erred in drafting the provisions of Sections 17 (5) (c) and 17 (5) (d) of GST Act,2017 which have specific inbuilt restrictions. 6.1: Further, it is submitted that the findings given on clause (c) of sub section 5 of Section 17 of the GST Act,2017 by the Hon'ble the authority for advance ruling under GST, Madhya Prades....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... full ITC under the provisions of Section 16(1) of the CGST Act, 2017." The appellant opined that, upon perusal of the above findings and Advance Ruling, the Authority for Advance Ruling might have read out clauses (c) and (d) along and not made efforts to read in combination of (c) & (d) with sub-section 17 (5) as furnished hereunder. Had they done so, they might have understood the meaning of sub-section 17 (5) (c) properly and the advance ruling would have been otherwise. Section-17(5):- notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of Section 16 and sub-section (1) of Section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following namely: (a)............ (b)............ (c) Works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service; Further, the provisions of Section 16 (1) and Section 18 (1) were over ridden or overruled by sub-section 17 (5) i.e., notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of Section 16 and sub-section (1) of Section 18. Therefore, it is submitted ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....usiness of works contract more specifically Government works and they use the following goods and services as inputs for rendering the output service i.e. works contract service. 1. Crushed metal chips 2. Bitumen 3. Gravel 4. Hot mix or Batch Mix plant 5. Road rollers, 6. Paver Finishers 7. Tippers, earth moving machinery, 8. Using the services of consultants, hiring of machinery, vehicles and sub contractors 9. Repairs and maintenance of machinery etc. 10. Any other inputs, services and machinery used for executing the works, which was not specified above. It is submitted that they strongly and vehemently object the stand taken by the learned Superintendent Central Tax. He totally misread and misinterpreted the provisions related to blocking of input credit. Fundamentally the eligibility and conditions for claiming input credit will be governed by Sec 16 of the CGST Act but not by Sec 17. Sec 17 of CGST Act deals with apportionment and blocking of input tax credit. 1.2 Every registered person is eligible to take credit of input of GST paid on the goods purchased and incorporated in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tself is the business activity of the registered person and for rendering such works contract service if he/it purchases goods and services provisions of sec 17 (5) ( c) are not applicable and that is the reason in Sec 17 (5) (c) exception clause was incorporated. 1.5 Clause (c) and clause (d) of Sec 17 (5) are by its very nature when read in isolation point to blocking of input tax credit vis a vis building construction expenditure. Explanation below the two clauses (c) and (d) of Sec 17 (5) excludes from the ambit of input tax credit certain amounts of expenditure and in this regard limit such blocking to the extent amount of expenditure capitalized in the books of account. In other words, any expenditure that is not capitalized but charged to revenue in the books will not be subject to credit blocking. Thus, ITC on input goods and services supplied within the scope of the two clauses (c) and (d) as well as under the explanation when capitalized will be subject to credit blocking. Here in the instant case all the inputs and input services used for execution of works will be charged as revenue expenditure in the books hence will not be subject to credit blocking. 1.6 I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xmann.com 251 (SC) 1.8 Section 17 (5) (c) and explanation to Sec 17 (5) (c) reads as under: 17 (5) Not withstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of Section 16 and sub-section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely: a).......... b)......... c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery)except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service; Explanation - For the purpose of clauses (c) and (d), the expression "construction" includes reconstruction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalization, to the said immovable property; As explained in paras 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 above Sr No. 6 (a) of Schedule II of CGST Act states that composite supply of 'works contract' shall be treated as 'supply of service'. This is a deeming provision, as clarified in section 7 (1A) of CGST Act. For executing works contracts both input and input services will be procured/ used. Ld. Superintendent wrongly interpreted the expression "except where it....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....any tax elements. As per this G.O estimated contract values quoted by Government Engineering department are basic rates only exclusive of all indirect taxes. AP Government has done like this because the ITC is available to works contractors on inputs and input services utilized for executing works. In view of the above submissions and legal position the respondent humbly submitted that argument put forth by the Ld. Superintendent of Central Tax has no weight and legal backing. 4. Discussion & Findings: We have gone through the entire records of the appeal, facts of the case, and also considered the written and oral submissions made at length by the appellant and the respondent as well, in light of the Ruling pronounced by the AAR. 4 (i) Consequent upon the extension of time limits for "completion of any proceeding or passing of any order ..." vide Notification No. 35/2020-Central Tax dated 3-4-2020 and as further extended by Notification No. 55/2020-Central Tax dated 27-6-2020 to 31''' August, 2020, this ruling / order is being taken up for issue. The issue at hand for discussion is whether the applicant is eligible for Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e CGST Act, 201.7, is reproduced hereunder for ready reference: Section 16 explains the Eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit. 16. (1) Every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed and in the manner specified in section 49, be entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business and the said amount shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger of such person. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no registered person shall be entitled to the credit of any input tax in respect of any supply of goods or services or both to him unless,- (a) he is in possession of a tax invoice or debit note issued by a supplier registered under this Act, or such other tax paying documents as may be prescribed; (b) he has received the goods or services or both. Explanation. -For the purposes of this clause, it shall be deemed that the registered person has received the goods where the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ailable in respect of the works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service. Thus, ITC for works contract can be availed only by one who is in the same line of business and is using such services received for further supply of works contract service. For example a building developer may engage services of a subcontractor for certain portion of the whole work. The subcontractor will charge GST in the tax invoice raised on the main contractor. The main contractor will be entitled to take ITC on the tax invoice raised by his sub-contractor as his output is works contract service. However if the main contractor provides works contract service (other than for plant and machinery) to a company say in the IT business the ITC of GST paid on the invoice raised by the works contractor will not be available to the IT Company." It is clearly evident that what is blocked Under Section 17 (5) (c) is the ITC of tax paid on the Works Contract service when sought to be availed by the Principal (i.e., Engineering Departments). This is not the case in this....