Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (2) TMI 594

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR. JAIMIN R DAVE(7022) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 PRIYANK S DAVE(9465) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR MR BHATT SENIOR COUNSEL WITH MR KARAN SANGHANI, ADVOCATE FOR M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - an assessee ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en the assessment for the A. Y. 2016-17 under Section 147 of the Act, essentially on the ground that the assessee failed to offer an amount of Rs. 52 Lakh for taxation while filing return of income for the year under consideration. The amount, which the Revenue is talking about, is the amount said to have been received by the assessee in connection with sale of a property. In the reasons assigned ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Counsel assisted by Mr. Karan Sanghani, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue. 6. We find merit in the contention raised by Mr. Dave that the reasons assigned by the Assessing Officer for reopening of the assessment for the relevant year are factually incorrect. This is apparent from page : 35 of the paper book, which is a part of the return of income filed by the writ applicant. In colum....