2022 (1) TMI 1188
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Ahmedabad-5, dated 30/03/2015 arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The assessee....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....add, amend, alter and withdraw any ground of appeal anytime up to the hearing of this appeal. 3. The only issue raised by the assessee is that the learned CIT (A) erred in confirming the order of the AO by sustaining the addition of Rs. 15,44,543.00 on account of non-deduction of tax under section 194A read with section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 4. The facts in brief are that the assessee in the pre....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re us contended that there was an amendment by the Finance Act (No.2) 2014 under the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act which restricted the disallowance to 30% only of the expenses in respect of which TDS was not deducted. Such amendment was held to be retrospective. In view of the above, the learned AR requested to restrict the disallowance of the impugned expenses to the tune of 30% onl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he tune of 30% in respect of the expenses on which TDS was not deducted by the assessee. Such amendment was retrospective as held by the Delhi Tribunal in the case of Muradul Haque vs. ITO reported in 184 ITD 58 wherein it was held as under: We find that Finance (No.2) Act has made amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Act w.e.f. 1-4-2015. Various benches of the Tribunals including the Delhi Ben....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI