Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1984 (8) TMI 71

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....court was delivered by JAGANNATHA SHETTY J.-This is a reference under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The question referred is: " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that an amount of Rs. 52,944 paid by the assessee as penalty for non-payment of sales tax is an allowable deduction in computing its business income ?" ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t represented only damages paid to the Government for the belated payment of tax due. That contention was accepted by the Tribunal and it directed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 52,944 from the taxable income. The answer to the question raised turns on the nature of the penalty leviable under s. 13(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. In Sterling Construction & Trading Co. v. Commer....