Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1983 (10) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... question of law arising out of the order of the Tribunal for the opinion of this court. The accountable person filed his return as regards the estate of late K. S. Subbanna Gounder showing the value of the deceased's share in the firm of M/s. Madras Wire Products as Rs. 1,29,625. The accountable person is the son of the deceased. Along with the return the accountable person has also sent a balance-sheet of the said firm showing the value of the deceased's share at Rs. 3,79,336. To the balance-sheet the accountable person has appended a note explaining the reason for returning a value of Rs. 1,29,625 as against the balance-sheet value. The Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, while making the assessment under the E.D. Act, examined in de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cated that the statement annexed to the form of accounts clearly showed that the revaluation was only intended to improve the picture presented by the balance-sheet which prior to the revaluation was rather bleak by reason of accumulated losses, that the Assistant Controller has considered this aspect of the matter before deciding to accept the declared value for the interest of the deceased in the firm and that the enhancement of the value effected by the order of rectification is based on a mere change of opinion on the same set of facts and that, therefore, the rectification order manifestly fell outside the scope of s. 61. In this view, the Appellate Controller has not gone into the merits of the rectification order. The Revenue took....