Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1983 (10) TMI 21

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his matter, the assessee who is represented by advocate Mr. Chimanlal T. Mody has chosen to remain absent. However, it is clear that the matter is concluded by the decision of the Full Bench of this High Court in CIT v. Daimler Benz [1977] 108 ITR 961. A few facts may be stated as under: The assessee is M/s. P. Rajesh and Company, a registered firm which carries on business in art silk cloth on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....use has been properly appreciated, the ITO should have waived the levy of interest under rule 117A(v) of the I.T. Rules, 1962. The AAC in his order referred to s. 139(8) of the I.T. Act, 1961, and holding that the ITO had failed to consider the appellant's submissions, set aside the assessment as far as the levy of interest was concerned. Being aggrieved by the order of the AAC, the Revenue cam....