2021 (12) TMI 1184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORDER Heard Mr. B. M. Tripathi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned G. A. - II as well as Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned Spl.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Chaibasa Sadar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019. It has been alleged that the premises of M/s. Balaji Enterprises was inspected by the informant but it was not found and in th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nted premises would not be sublet to any other person in any situation. It has further been alleged that the petitioner had given the aforesaid office to Rakesh Kumar Garg proprietor of M/s. Tirupati Enterprises and the petitioner had deposited online fee of Rs. 100/- for registration of VAT and GST of the firm through Bank of India account held in the name of the petitioner. On verification, it w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the staffs of the petitioner having branches at different places. Learned senior counsel has referred to Sections 72 and 73 of the Jharkhand Goods and services Tax Act, 2017 and has stated that the mandate laid down in the said provisions have not been followed. It has further been argued while referring to the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Madras High Court in Writ Petition No. 5501 o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has referred to a comparative chart depicted in Paragraph - 8 of the counter affidavit while highlighting the modus operandi of the petitioner in causing loss to the State exchequer. It has been submitted that the petitioner is the master mind of the entire fraudulent exercise. Mr. Pati, further submits that the petitioner is also an a....