Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (12) TMI 887

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gents and diagnostic reagents, falling under tariff heading 3822, in India. In view of the above the applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the following question: Whether 'diagnostic and laboratory reagents' imported and supplied by the applicant and classified under heading 3822 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 are covered under Entry No. 80 of Schedule H to the Notification No.1/ 2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting a levy of Integrated Tax at the rate of 12%? 3. Admissibility of the application: The question is about applicability of entry number 80 of Schedule II to the Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which is covered under "Applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of CGST/KGST Act 2017" and hence the instant application is admissible under Section 97(2)(b) of the CGST Act 2017. 4. The applicant furnished the following facts relevant to their stated activity: 4.1 The applicant is engaged in the business of import and sale of medical & laboratory instruments, laboratory reagents and diagnostic reagents in India. They have been importing and selling reagents under tariff heading 3822 and discharging applicable taxes ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Diagnostic or laboratory reagents on a backing, prepared diagnostic or laboratory reagents whether or not on a backing. Other than those of heading 3002 or 3006; certified reference materials:   --- For medical diagnosis: 38220011 ---- Pregnancy confirmation reagents 38220012 ---- Reagents for diagnosing AIDS 38220019 ---- Other 38220090 --- Other c) Thus, it can be observed that heading 3822 of the Customs Tariff is very broad and covers both diagnostics and laboratory reagents within its ambit. In fact, heading 3822 does not make any bifurcation between diagnostics and laboratory reagents and it is only sub-heading of the said Chapter which bifurcates reagents into (a) medical diagnostic reagent (b) other reagents. d) The description under Entry No 80 of Schedule 2 of GST Rate Notification covers within its ambit 'all diagnostic kits and reagents'. Said Entry is reproduced below for ease of reference: Sr. No. Tariff heading Description of Goods Rate of Tax 80 3822 All diagnostic kits and reagents 12% e) For a product to be covered under the said entry there are following prerequisites: (I) It should be classified under Tariff heading 3822 and (i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ttee was constituted by the GST Council to examine the representations received from Central and State Governments and other stakeholders regarding rate of GST to be levied on various products. The objective of the Fitment Committee was to recommend suitable rate of tax on various goods so as to lower the indirect tax burden being incurred on such goods pre-GST. The Fitment Committee, in its meeting held on 07-08 June 2017, examined such representations with reference to the incidence of aggregate existing indirect taxes under erstwhile laws, and recommended a rate of 12% for Diagnostics or Laboratory Reagents' covered under heading 3822 as opposed to the then existing tax incidence of 18.89 %. Additionally, the Committee inserted an explanation along side the said recommendation that "all diagnostic kits and reagents of 3822 may be kept at 12%". The recommendations of the Fitment Committee were taken up as item no. 3 in the agenda of 16th GST Council Meeting dated 11 June 2017. Copy of the Agenda Items for 16th GST Council Meeting is enclosed herewith and marked as "Exhibit 3". The relevant extract of the same is re-produced below: Sl.No. Heading Description of Goods Present I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ourt [2017 (1) TMI 958- Supreme Court] ii. KP Varghese vs. Income-Tax Officer, Supreme Court [1981 AIR 1922] iii. Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., Supreme Court [2021 (4) TMI 613-Supreme Court] f) Thus, in view of the above, the laboratory and diagnostic reagents imported and supplied by the Applicant, without any doubt, falls within the ambit of Entry No. 80 of Schedule 2 of GST Rate Notification and any ambiguities arising there from is susceptible to be overshadowed by the clear legislative intent while formulating the said entry. 5.3. View is supported by various rulings of Advance Ruling authorities and Karnataka Appellate Advance Ruling authority a) The interpretation adopted and put forward by the Applicant is supported by the ruling pronounced by Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka in the matter of Re: M/s. Chromachemie Laboratory Private Limited [KAR /AAAR- 08/2019-20], dealing with identical facts and circumstances. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that all reagents falling under heading 3822, whether diagnostic or laboratory, are covered under Entry No. 80 of Schedule 2 of the GST Ra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ubha Scientific Research Laboratory Private Ltd., Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling [KAR ADRG 24/2021] ii. Re: M/s Analytica Chemie Inc., Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling [KAR ADRG 25/2021] iii. Re: M/s Neogen Food and Animal Security (India) Private Ltd. Kerala Authority for Advance Ruling [KER/ 106/2021] 5.4 Residual entry cannot be considered when there is a specific entry a) GST Rate Notification at Entry No. 453 to Schedule 3 provides a residuary category wherein all goods which are not specified in any other schedule shall be subjected to GST at the rate of 18%. However, given that the reagents imported and supplied by the Applicant is covered under the Specific Entry No 80 of Schedule 2, they cannot be taxed under the residual category. b) In this regard, applicant would like to submit that it is settled principle of law that reference should be made to the general or residual entry only when a particular goods does not get covered under the specific entry. Applicant would like to further put reliance on the judgement in the case of Commercial Taxes Officer vs. Jalani Enterprises [2011 (266) E.L.T. 289 (SC)] wherein the Supreme Court has held that resort ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n nature of allocation of rate of tax applicable on various products, and not grant of exemption from imposition of tax. Classification of a particular product under an entry levying tax on a lesser rate does not imply an exemption on that product. Hence, interpretation of language in GST Rate Notification, not being an exemption notification, must be construed in a way to benefit the assessee in case of any doubt regarding its applicability. In this regard, reliance is placed by the applicant on the following judgements: i. M/S. Southern Motors vs. State of Karnataka, Supreme Court [2017 (1) TMI 958- Supreme Court] ii. Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s Mewar Bartan Nirman Udyog, Supreme Court [2008 (231) E.L.T. 27 (SC)] iii. M/S Hotel Leela Venture Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, Supreme Court [2009 (234) E.L.T. 389 (S.C.)] iv. M/s Star Industries vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Supreme Court [2015 (324) E.L.T. 656 (SC)] v. Saraswati Sugar Mills vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Supreme Court [2011 (270) E.L.T. 465 (SC)] vi. State of Jharkhand vs. M/s La Opala Rg. Ltd., Supreme Court [2014 AIR 1273] vii. Nandi Printers Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka, K....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dered the issues involved on which advance ruling is sought by the applicant and relevant facts along with the arguments made by the applicant during the personal hearing. 9. The applicant is engaged in the business of import and sale of medical & laboratory instruments, laboratory reagents and diagnostic reagents in India. They have been importing and selling reagents under tariff heading 3822 and discharging applicable taxes levied thereon. 10. The issue before us to decide is whether the reagents being imported & supplied by the applicant under tariff heading 3822 are covered under Entry No.80 of Schedule II to the Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and Notification No.1/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) both dated 28.06.2017 or not. We proceed to examine the issue. 11. The entry no. 80 of Schedule II to the Notification No. 01/2017 - Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which is taxable at 12%, reads as under: Schedule II- 12% S.No. Chapter/Heading/ Sub-heading/ Tariff Item Description of Goods 80 3822 All diagnostic kits and reagents The point of contention is whether the concessional rate of 12% GST is applicable to all the reagents or only to the diagnostic re....