Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (12) TMI 830

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Respondent.   P. C. : The following questions of law are proposed in this appeal: 1. Whether the payment in the nature of commission made to directors of the assessee company is liable for tax deduction under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the said Act) being in the nature of commission ? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ector (CMD) of the Company for Rs. 1,08,00,000/- at the year end but not deducted TDS under Section 194H of the said Act. The commission was paid to the CMD in the subsequent year, i.e., during the Assessment Year 2010-2011 after deducting TDS. According to Shri Sharma commission provision calls for disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) in the impugned Assessment Year.   3. Before Commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ailed to do so, the same called for disallowance under Section 40(A)(ia) of the said Act. 5. Shri Kapadia tendered copy of Form-16 of CMD which is taken on record and pointed out that Form-16 of the CMD for the Assessment Year 2010-2011 showed that commission was part of overall compensation/salary of the CMD and hence TDS in respect thereof is covered under Section 192 of the said Act.   ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....accrual of expenses is not disputed, there cannot be any perversity in the order passed by CIT(A) or by ITAT in concurring with the findings of CIT (A). 8. Commissioner of Income tax, Delhi, Ajmer, Rajasthan and Madhya Bharat vs. Nagri Mills Co. Ltd. 33 ITR 681, this Court has observed as under: "We have often wondered why the Income-tax authorities, in a matter such as this where the ....