Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (12) TMI 772

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s Court praying for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the said notice dated 20/3/2007 and order dated 30/11/2007 rejecting Petitioner's objections to the issuance of notice. 4. Assessment order for Assessment Year 2002-2003 had been passed on 6/12/2004. 5. Reasons for reopening are as under: "Recording of Reasons for initiating proceedings under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. A. Y. 2002-03 Under the provisions of Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred in relation to the income which does not form part of the total income. 2. In this case, the assessee has received dividend income of Rs. 3,05,17,219/- on it....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... view of the provision of Section 14A of the said Act. It was submitted that the company had a separate treasury department engaged in the business of carrying out deals in inter-corporate deposits/ loans and money market operations. This department carried on various financial activities and there was direct cost incurred by the department, specifically for earning dividend income. It was also submitted that no expenses allocation was ever made by the AO in the past. 10.1 I have gone through the facts and I find that in view of the specific provision of Section 14A, certain disallowance is called for. The total cost incurred by the treasury department during the period under consideration was Rs. 36,44,142/- The expenditure relata....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. 11. Therefore when the appeal had been preferred by Petitioner before the ITAT, and disallowance under Section 14A of the said Act is the subject matter of that appeal, the Assessing Officer could not have assessed or reassessed such income. Moreover by issuing the notice under Section 148 of the said Act as quoted above, the Assessing Officer in fact is sitting in appeal over the decision of CIT(A) to disallow only Rs. 1,82,207/- under Section 14A of the said Act. If he was aggrieved by the decision of CIT(A) to disallow only Rs. 1,82,207/- under Section 14A of the said Act, Revenue could have filed an appeal before ITAT. Having missed the bus, the Assessing Officer cannot adopt the route of re-opening and issue notice under Section ....