Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (12) TMI 622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....EMBER (JUDICIAL) Shri A. Shunmugasundaram, Advocate for the Appellant Ms. K. Komathi, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER Brief facts which are undisputed, as could be gathered from the orders of lower authorities as well as after hearing both sides, inter alia, are that the appellant had taken on lease the maintenance of toilets at the Central Bus Stand and the New Bus ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....heir letters dated 24.05.2019 filed refund claim for Rs. 13,56,747/- and Rs. 7,11,081/-, which were under process with the Department; that the appellant vide letter dated 16.08.2019 requested the Assistant Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise, Tirunelveli to refund the Service Tax of Rs. 20,67,828/-; that Tirunelveli Municipal Corporation had paid Rs. 13,56,747/- on 03.04.2017 and Rs. 7,11,0....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and Ms. K. Komathi, Learned Additional Commissioner for the Revenue. 4. The only issue to be decided is: whether the Revenue was justified in rejecting the refund claim of the appellant as time-barred? 5. I have carefully considered the facts of the case vis-à-vis the decisions/rulings referred to during the course of arguments and I find that there are contrary decisions of higher f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....own by the Hon'ble Apex Court, and therefore we have no hesitation in holding that the claim of the Assessee for a sum of Rs. 4,39,683/- cannot be barred by limitation, and ought to be refunded. 14. There is no doubt in our minds, that if the Revenue is allowed to keep the excess service tax paid, it would not be proper, and against the tenets of Article 265 of the Constitution of India. ....