1989 (8) TMI 373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....phs of the plaint. (2) The brief facts set out in the plaint are that plaintiff while was working with defendants as General Manager, his services were terminated by the defendants vide order dated 25th May, 1984 with immediate, effect In lieu of three months notice, he was given three months pay in the form of a cheque of ₹ 13,920.00 . The service of the plaintiff appears to have been terminated on the ground that he wanted to set up a parallel business for which he had gone on long leave. However, his services were allegedly terminated in accordance with the appointment letter and also on he ground that his services were no longer required. The plaintiff has challenged the impugned order on the various grounds that the order of ter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ges. (2) No relief for damages shall be granted under this section unless the plaintiff has claimed such relief in his plaint : Provided that, where no such damages have been claimed in the plaint, the court shall, at any stage of the proceeding allow the plaintiff to amend the plaint on such terms as may be just for including such claim. (3) The dismissal of a suit to prevent the branch of an obligation existing in favor of the plaintiff shall bar his right to sue for damages for such breach." (3) The section aims at preventing multiplicity of suits and compels plaintiffs to sue for all possible reliefs in respect of breaches, actual or threatened of obligations, existing in their favor, in one and the same suit on pain of forfeiting....