2021 (12) TMI 574

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to the deposit of employees' contributions qua ESI & PF after the due date as prescribed in the relevant Acts, however, before the due date of filing of return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act, resulting into disallowance of Rs. 5,88,203/- for A.Y.2018-2019 and Rs. 60,540/- for A.Y.2019-2020 made by the A.O. 3. Against the above order of AO, the assessee preferred first appeals before the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) sustained the additions made by the AO for the respective assessment years under consideration while dismissing both the appeals of the assessee. 4. Further feeling aggrieved, the assessee is in appeals before us. 5. Having heard the parties and perused the material available on record. The assessee raised the arguments again....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st the assessee. The ld. CIT(A) further observed that the judgments and orders relied upon by the assessee have been rendered before the clarificatory amendments made in the Finance Act, 2021 and the Finance Act, 2021 has put an end to this controversy. 5.2 Admittedly there is plethora of judgments in favour of the Assessee's contention and of the Revenue. The controversy with regard to divergent views of different High Courts, has been settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Vegetables Products Ltd. (88 ITR 192) by laying the dictum that if two reasonable constructions of a taxing provision are possible that construction which favours the Assessee must be adopted. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the cas....