Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (12) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1 under Section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") vide orders dated 17.03.2015 and 23.03.2016 respectively. 2. The facts and circumstances of the issue are exactly identical in both the years, hence, we will take the facts from Assessment Year 2009-10 in ITA No. 1226/Mum/2020 and will decide the issue. 3. The only issue argued before me is that the CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in confirming the disallowance of bogus purchases to the extent of Rs. 2,67,82,700/-. For this, assessee has raised the following Ground no. 4 :- "4. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in facts in confirming disallowance of bogus purchase to Rs. 2,67,82,700/-." The brief facts are that the ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rtation, if by Road Vehicle No. and also payments, detailed in the annexure-A. The assessee filed the purchase bills/sale bills, payments made by account payee cheques, produced the books of account and also the stock register, but could not produce the delivery challans, transportation receipts, octroi receipts, etc. The assessee also could not produce the parties and hence the Assessing Officer estimated the profit rate at 12.5% of the bogus purchases and thereafter made addition on account of non-genuine purchases at Rs. 33,47,838/-. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). 4. The CIT(A) confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer and also enhanced the addition of bogus purchases to 100% as against the addition mad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....)). 6.3 When the assessee appellant has failed to substantiate the claim against impugned purchases, the entire bogus purchases are to be disallowed. There is no basis for an addition of 12.5% of such bogus purchases and consequent allowance of 87.5% of such unsubstantiated purchases." 5. The CIT(A) also rejected the argument that sales could not have been made without purchases. For this, the CIT(A) recorded the following findings :- "6.11 .............. Every argument in logic has a structure that is premises and conclusion. Premises are statements which give evidence for, or reasons for accepting the conclusion and conclusion is a statement which is purported to be established or affirmed on the basis of oth....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Court in the case of M/s. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. dt. 11.02.2019, were that the Ld. AO added the entire sum on account of goods never being supplied to the assessee; the CIT(A) compared the purchases and sales statement of the assessee and observed that the department had accepted the sale and therefore there was no reason to reject the purchases, because without purchases there could not be sales and restricted the addition to 10% of the purchase amount and directed the AO to make an addition to the extent of difference between the GP rate as per the books of accounts on undisputed purchases and GP on sales relating to purchases made from disputed parties. The ITAT noted that the CIT(A) had not given any reasons for retaining 10% of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ods inward register maintained at the godown and octroi challans. For this reason, the Assessing Officer came to the conclusion that the assessee has indulged in non-genuine purchases and intention of indulging in such activity is to suppress the true profit. Hence, the Assessing Officer applied profit rate of 12.5% of the total non-genuine purchases by stating that it would be just and fair if the profit element embedded in such purchases is taken as the profit earned from such purchases shown to have been made from non-existent parties. The learned counsel stated that the CIT(A) has simply enhanced the addition by treating the entire bogus purchases as profit whereas it is a fact that sales made by assessee are not doubted. Once sales are....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s with date, invoice, delivery challans of goods as per invoice, quantity, details of payment made by account payee cheques only. The said quantity of goods item-wise sold by the assessee was also given with invoice numbers, names of vendees, quantity, payment received by account payee cheques, transportation receipts, identification of stock statement of sales against such purchases. The assessee also submitted delivery challans of vendors as well as vendees with transportation receipts and assessee has discharged its initial onus casted upon it by the Act. We noted that the assessee could not produce the parties or the addresses given by the assessee of the parties from whom assessee had made purchases remained unverified. The Income Tax ....