Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1983 (12) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lity of Rs. 16,30,093 be allowed as a deduction in computing the principal value of the estate. The petitioners also claimed that from the estate duty payable, the probate duty payable should be deducted. The petitioners paid an amount of Rs. 6,35,650 as estate duty on the basis of the return. The respondent No. 1 passed a provisional assessment order dated September 21, 1979, under s. 57(1) of the Act without taking into account the deductions claimed by the petitioners. Respondent No. valued the estate of the deceased at Rs. 47,69,584 and determined the estate duty payable at Rs. 30,26,146.40. Respondent No. 1 by notice dated September 21, 1979, raised a demand of Rs. 30,13,660.69. As the petitioners failed to pay the amount demanded b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rovisional assessment of the estate duty payable by the person delivering the account on the basis of the account so delivered." The learned counsel urged that the provisional assessment made under s. 57(1) of the Act is summary in nature and the Assistant CED is not bound to make any inquiry before making such assessment. The object of assessment is to collect tax from certain classes of assessees before the regular assessment. Shri Mehta submits that the provisional assessment being summary in nature and without requiring the controlling authority to hold any inquiry and as there is no right to the assessee to prefer any appeal against the provisional assessment, it must be held that the Controller must pass the order of provisional as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the assessee exceeds the amount admitted by him, nor whether the allowances or deductions claimed are admissible. If there be discrepancy between the return made and the accounts and documents accompanying the return, the Income-tax Officer may ask the assessee to explain the discrepancy, but he must make a provisional assessment on the basis of the return initially made or clarified and the accounts and documents filed. He cannot make a provisional assessment by holding that certain claims made by the assessee are in law unjustified." Shri Mehta submits, and in my judgment correctly, that the petitioners raised disputed questions of law as to whether the petitioners are entitled to claim deductions in respect of (1) estate duty liabi....