2019 (9) TMI 1619

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant, Advocate Shri Bansi Lal, instructed by Advocate Shri G.S. Rama Rao for Respondent No. 1 and Advocates Shri Delep Goswami with Ms. Manjula Devi and Shri Anirrud Goswami for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. 2. This Appeal has been filed against interim order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench on 6th February, 2019, which reads as under "Petitioners including consenting Petitioners claims that the shares in Pg. 19 of the Petition ought to have been registered in their name. However, it appears that the said shares are wrongly remaining the name of R2 as per extract of Annual Returns filed by the Respondent Company for 31.03.2014 and 31.05.2015 showing as though R2 is holding 95.5% of the total share capi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....required and prayed. Petitioner is directed to issue another notice to Respondents for their appearance, time granted for filing counter. Put up the matter on 18.02.2019." 3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that when this order was passed, the Appellant who was Respondent No. 2 in the Company Petition, was not heard and thus, the present Appeal was required to be filed. When the present Appeal was filed, This Tribunal on 16th May, 2019 passed the following order:- "Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and being satisfied with the grounds, the delay of 42 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 1579 of 2019 stands disposed of. Let notice be issued on the respondents by Sp....