1985 (7) TMI 85

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....recting the Income-tax Officer to pass two separate assessment orders for the two periods ?" The material facts are these. The assessee is a firm, which was originally constituted on January 1, 1968, with four partners and the same was granted registration. On June 30, 1975, one of the partners, Jasumal, expired. A new firm was constituted on July 7, 1975, with effect from July 3, 1975, in which the new partners (sic) of income for the assessment year 1976-77, one for the period from January 1, 1975, to, June 30, 1975, and another for the period from July 3, 197.5, to December 31, 1975. The Income-tax Officer held that it was a case of a change in the constitution of the firm and, therefore, only one assessment was to be made for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... well as the reasons, on which it was based, was affirmed. Accordingly, the Tribunal held that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was right in directing the Income-tax Officer to frame two assessments as required by section 188 of the Income-tax Act. Aggrieved by the Tribunal's decision, the Revenue applied for a reference to this court under section 256(1) of the Act and the same has been made for answering the above question. At the outset, it may be mentioned that an amendment has been Made in section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by adding a proviso therein with effect from April 1, 1975, as under : " Provided that nothing contained in clause (a) shall apply to a case where the firm is dissolved on the death of any of i....