Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (6) TMI 24

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n holding that the assessee is entitled to initial depreciation under section 32(1)(iv) of the I.T. Act, on the cost of the co-operative stores building ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to depreciation allowance on the cost of preparation and reproduction of drawings, specifications and other technical information paid to the foreign collaborator, on the basis that they are plant within the meaning of section 32 ? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in disallowing the assessee's claim for deduction of Rs. 27,64,811 relating to the earth-mover division on amortisation basis ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fall under s. 32(1)(iv) of the Act. But on an appeal filed by the assessee, the Tribunal has accepted the same and has allowed it as an admissible depreciation allowance, the correctness of which is disputed by the Revenue. Sri K. Srinivasan, learned senior standing counsel appearing for the Revenue, contends that on the plain language of s. 32(1)(iv) of the Act, " co-operative stores " cannot be treated as a " canteen " for which reason, the initial depreciation claimed on the construction of the same was inadmissible. Sri K. P. Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the assessee, refuting the contention of Sri Srinivasan sought to support the view expressed by the Tribunal. In accepting the claim of the assessee, the Tribunal, refe....