Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (5) TMI 46

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of an individual. The assessment years are 1968-69 and 1969-70. The assessee was the owner of Ganeshdih Colliery. It was leased out to Prabhulal Agrawal and Magilal Sharma. The assessee returned an income of Rs. 34,533 as income from business. In view of the lease in favour of the managing contractor, the claim of income from business was rejected by the ITO and it was held to be income from " Ot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pressed the same view. This being the position, we hold that the income of the assessee is assessable under the head 'Business' and not from `Other sources'. " The appeal of the assessee was thus allowed by the Tribunal. At the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, a consolidated reference has been made to this court. The question of law referred to us reads as under: " Whether, on the fac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sources ". The second ground was that the Punjab High Court in Nauharchand Chananram v. CIT [1971] 82 ITR 189, had expressed the view that income from the lease of the kind with which we are concerned must be treated as income from " Business ". The Tribunal thus gave its judgment following the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The short answer is that the decision of the Punjab and H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y [1974] BBCJ 440 and CIT v. Sahana and Sons [1976] 102 ITR 437 (Pat), as also in Tax Cases Nos. 85 to 90 of 1976-CIT v., Kuya and Khas Kuya Colliery Co. [1985] 156 ITR 206, which have been disposed of today. I have not the least doubt that by executing a lease in favour of the managing contractor, the lessor/contractor/managing agent completely disassociates himself from the business. Nothing was....