Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1983 (6) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... During the year of account, the business of the firm was acquired by a private limited company, namely, M/s. Nelson Type Foundry Private Ltd., on April 15, 1973, as per the agreement entered into by the firm and the company on March 21, 1973. In the return of income filed by the firm, the firm has included business income of Rs. 2,09,589, which included s. 41(2) profit of Rs. 1,47,341. Besides, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efore the Tribunal, the Revenue relied on a decision of the Gujarat High Court in CIT v. Mohanbhai Pamabhai [1973] 91 ITR 393, as against the decision in CIT v. Rathnam Nadar [1969] 71 ITR 433, referred to and followed by the AAC. The tribunal confirmed the decision of the AAC that a sum of Rs. 3,31,700 should be deleted from the head " Capital gains ". Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Court also in CIT v. Srinivasa Setty [1981] 128 ITR 294 (SC), has approved the decision of this court in CIT v. Rathnam Nadar [1969] 71 ITR 433, and has held that goodwill is a self-generating asset, that it does not cost anything in terms of money to an assessee and that, therefore, it cannot be included as part of capital gains. In view of the fact that the decision of the Tribunal in this case....