Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (11) TMI 243

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as been filed M/s. N R Agarwal Industries Ltd against denial of cenvat credit of invoices issue prior to dated 01.09.2014 on the ground that it was taken after the lapse a period of six months/one year. The issue under dispute relates to the applicability of Notification No. 21/2014-CE(NT) dated 11.07.2014 to the credit taken on invoices issued prior to 01.09.2014. Vide Notification No.21/2014-CE(....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....4-CE(N.T.) whether the claim of cenvat credit is time barred. I find that though there are various decision on the issue however, the Division Bench in the case of BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD. V/S. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CENTRAL TAX GOODS AND SERVICE TAX. held that the limitation of 6 months provided as per notification no 21/2014-CE(N.T.) is not applicable in cases where the invoi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lloys and Power Pvt Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai [2018 (11) TMI 1019-CESTAT Chennai] 4 E/53851-53852/2018-[DB] (v) Umesh Engineering Works vs. Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru West [2019 (1) TMI 1158- CESTAT Bangalore] (vi) Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd. vs. CCE & ST, Raipur [2019 (4) TMI 473-CESTAT New Delhi] Wherein it was clearly held that the six month limitatio....