2014 (9) TMI 1246
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee, Ms. P. Koley. ORDER The defendants complain of an exparte ad interim order passed in an appeal from the refusal of an exparte ad interim injunction. It appears from the orders passed by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court, that the plaintiffs claim to be bonafide members of the petitioner society who had been unfairly expelled from the society, whereupon the plaintiffs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... declined the ad interim injunction, the Appellate Court considered the matter afresh and restrained the petitioner society from giving effect to the resolutions that were then proposed to be passed at its annual general meeting then convened to be held on September 19 and 20, 2014. The Appellate Court appears to have missed the reason indicated in the Trial Court order for declining the ex parte....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the business or the objects of the companies or societies for the next year. Further, the appellate court completely ignored the doctrine of indoor management. Courts are loathe to interfere with the internal matters of bodies corporate and societies, unless a manifest case of injustice or fraud is made out. The order impugned suffers from the malaise that merely because the appeal may become in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....endants, such written objection be filed by October 27, 2014; rejoinder thereto, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter. It is also made clear that the resolutions passed at the relevant annual general meeting will abide by the result of the injunction application. It is submitted by the petitioners herein that neither the plaint nor the injunction application filed in the Trial Court has....