2021 (10) TMI 1271

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....abric Industries through its proprietor has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India so as to challenge the judgment and order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30.12.2008 in respect to the assessment year 2005-2006 and the subsequent order dated 24.04.2009 again passed by the Tribunal rejecting the application of the petitioner for rectifying the earlier order. 3. Briefly stated the assessing authority for the relevant year vide assessment order dated 28.12.2007 denied benefit under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act as the petitioner could not produce evidence regarding consumption of electricity to establish actual production. The appeal against the said order was dismissed on 20.06.2008 by the Com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tax and Ors. vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal (2014) 1 SCC 603 in context with the matter under the Income Tax Act clearly laid down that when a statutory forum is created by law for redressal of any grievance, a writ petition should not be entertained. 6. There is no dispute to the fact that the petitioner by means of this writ petition have challenged the two orders passed by the tribunal i.e. dated 30.12.2008 and 24.04.2009. The first order has been passed by the tribunal in an appeal arising from the assessment order and the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The other order is an order of rejection of an application moved by the petitioner under Section 254(2) of the Act. 7. It is submitted that against all orders passed by the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on 254(2) of the Act. 12. The issue whether the order passed on an application under Section 254(2) of the Act is an order in appeal which is amenable to further appeal under Section 260-A of the Act was the bone of contention before the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court in Lachman Dass Bhatia vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & connected appeals (2011) 330 ITR 243 Del. The Full Bench upon consideration of the entire law categorized the orders passed under Section 254(2) of the Act into three categories and laid down as under: "(i) An order passed under Section 254(2) recalling an order in entirety would not be amenable to appeal under Section 260A of the Act. (ii) An order rejecting the application under Section 254(2) is not ....