Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (10) TMI 1028

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Commissioner, Sonepat. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the Applicants were engaged in the manufacture of Fluticason Propionate under Chapter 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They exported these goods, vide ARE-I No. 07/Coral drugs/17-18, dated 22-6-2017, under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. These goods were reimported by the Applicants, vide Bill of Entry No. 3984395, dated 13-11-2017 and a credit note dated 25-11-2017 was issued to their buyer. The Applicants again exported these goods, vide Invoice Nos. 179, dated 22-1-2018 and 233, dated 28-3-2018, both under Letter of Undertaking (LUT) under Rule 96A of the CGST Rules, 2017. The Applicants filed a rebate claim of Rs. 6,66,750 - on 25-4-2018 in respect of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efund of the duty shall be in accordance with the provisions of the existing law (Central Excise Law, in this case) if the goods are returned within a period of six months from 1-7-2017 and such goods are identifiable to the satisfaction of the proper officer. A substantive benefit cannot be denied on the basis of technicality. 4. Personal hearing was held on 14-6-2021. in virtual mode. Sh. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate, appeared for the Applicants. He reiterated the contents of the revision application. He specifically highlighted that the export had been completed in the first instance and all conditions of Rule 18 read with Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.) are fulfilled. Upon reimport, IGST was paid but at the stage of re-export IGST....