Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (8) TMI 66

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act "), does not raise any arguable question and as such it is not necessary to make a detailed discussion of the facts and circumstances which have given rise to the filing of this application under section 256(2) of the Act. It would be sufficient for the purpose of disposal of this application to state that a question....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat for which the Santati Kosh was created and further that the consent of all the major beneficiaries was not obtained by the trustees of the Santati Kosh before making the said transfer and that a direction of the competent civil Court was also not obtained so far as minor beneficiaries were concerned. It was, therefore, held by the Tribunal that the shares in question continued to remain the pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....plication No. 202 of 1979. So far as the order of the Tribunal dated March 31, 1978, is concerned, only one argument was advanced by the learned counsel for the assessee before us and it was submitted that a decision of their Lordships in Sardar Bahadur S. Indra Singh Trust v. CIT [1971] 82 ITR 561 (SC), was not referred to by either party at the time of arguments before the Appellate Tribunal, b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Income-tax Act and the Rules made thereunder as the Tribunal considered the decision in Sardar Bahadur S. Indra Singh Trust's case [1971] 82 ITR 561, in its judgment, without the same being cited by either party before the Tribunal and it was submitted that the assessee had no opportunity to explain the aforesaid decision before the Tribunal. We do not at all feel impressed by the argument a....