Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (8) TMI 1239

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ms. Manisha Sharma, Advocates. Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocate. The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing. Writ petition No. 3459/2021 was filed by the petitioner challenging the subsequent Form-3 dated 21st January, 2021 issued by the respondent/revenue after a full and final settlement of disputed taxes in Form-5 dated 28th December, 2020 (on the basis of Form-3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red functus officio after initial Form-5 had been issued on 28th December, 2020. In fact, the re-revised Form-3 dated 12th April, 2021 is identical to the initial Form-3 dated 23rd December, 2020. Consequently, the petitioner as of today is at the same position as he was on 23rd December, 2020. However, the learned counsel for respondent/revenue insists that the petitioner should once again file....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e and facilitate transactions and cannot be used as a basis for harassing an assessee by asking him to repeatedly file unnecessary and irrelevant forms. This Court is also of the view that the software and the computerised systems should abide by lawful directions and it cannot be that the computer lays down an agenda contrary to law according to which the Court and assessees have to function. If ....