1993 (8) TMI 318

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 1992 by which its application moved under Section 151, C.P.C. for taking on record certain original documents which could not be filed earlier has been dismissed. The facts of the case giving rise to this revision petition may be summarised thus. 2. ' The plaintiff-respondent has filed a suit for the recovery of ₹ 2,53,000/- against the State of Rajasthan (defendant-petitioner). By or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erment that the original documents could not be produced on 22-11-1991 due to the illness of the Executive Engineer Shri B. L. Gandhi. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the trial Court dismissed this application by its impugned order. 3. Arguments of the learned Government Advocate and the learned counsel for the plaintiff-non-petitioner have been heard and record has been peruse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (2) of Rule 1 of Order XVII of the Civil P. C. This proviso runs as under:-- "(b) No adjournment shall be granted at the request of a party, except where the circumstances are beyond the control of that party." On 22-11-1992, the trial Court had no option ) but to pass order for raising adverse inference : against the defendant-petitioner on account of the non-production of the origi....