1993 (8) TMI 318
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... No. I, Jodhpur dated February 17, 1992 by which its application moved under Section 151, C.P.C. for taking on record certain original documents which could not be filed earlier has been dismissed. The facts of the case giving rise to this revision petition may be summarised thus. 2. ' The plaintiff-respondent has filed a suit for the recovery of Rs. 2,53,000/- against the State of Rajastha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... moved on 12-2-1992 with the averment that the original documents could not be produced on 22-11-1991 due to the illness of the Executive Engineer Shri B. L. Gandhi. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the trial Court dismissed this application by its impugned order. 3. Arguments of the learned Government Advocate and the learned counsel for the plaintiff-non-petitioner have been....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ions of the proviso (b) of Sub-rule (2) of Rule 1 of Order XVII of the Civil P. C. This proviso runs as under:-- "(b) No adjournment shall be granted at the request of a party, except where the circumstances are beyond the control of that party." On 22-11-1992, the trial Court had no option ) but to pass order for raising adverse inference : against the defendant-petitioner on account ....
TaxTMI