Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (9) TMI 1035

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the case and under the law, the Id. CIT(A) had erred in not appreciating that once the registration u/s 12AA stood restored to the assessee, it cannot be denied exemption u/s 11/12 of the I.T. Act 1961, even though such exemption was claimed through a belatedly filed revised return. 2.That on the facts of the case and under the law, the CIT(A) had erred in not appreciating the assessee's submissions that the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Goetz (India) Ltd. is confined to the powers of the Assessing Officer and does not affect the powers of the CIT(Appeal). 3. That the Id. CIT(A) had erred in holding that in the light of the ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Goe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... u/s 11/12 of the I.T. Act 1961, even though such exemption was claimed through a belatedly filed revised return. 2. That on the facts of the case and under the law, the CIT(A) had erred in not appreciating the assessee's submissions that the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Goetz (India) Ltd. is confined to the powers of the Assessing Officer and does not affect the powers of the CIT(Appeal). 3. That the Id. CIT(A) had erred in holding that in the light of the ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Goetz (India) Ltd., no such claim (exemption u/s 11/12 of the I.T. Act 1961) can be entertained at this (first appellate) stage. 4. That on the facts of the case a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for General Public Utility. The assessee filed its return of Income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 electronically on 30.09.2012 vide E-filing Acknowledgment No. 506943631300912 , declaring the total income of Rs. 3,13,89,620.00. The assessment for the above stated Assessment Year was completed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 vide Order dated 20.03.2015 at a total income of Rs. 3,19,54,483.00 as detailed below - Returned Income   Rs. 31389620 Add (as discussed above) Disallowance u/s 40(a)(a) Rs. 564863 Assessed Income   Rs. 3,19,54,483/- During the course of Assessment Proceedings, the assessee has revised its Return ' to claim benefit/exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax ....