Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (9) TMI 1208

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mons bearing Sr. No. 9919 dated 06.11.2019. This Court, on 11.12.2019, was pleased to issue rule returnable on 15.01.2020 and further was pleased to pass an order that the applicant may not be arrested till the returnable date. Heard learned advocate for the applicant. It is submitted by learned advocate for the applicant that the applicant has never imported the goods nor sold in the Indian Market. That, the said goods are for the reexport purpose only. That, the applicant is doing repairing and refurbishing work and the machines were provided to the applicant for the purpose of repairing and/or refurbishing. That, the applicant has no role to play in the commission of the alleged offence as the applicant is not the importer of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petition and submitted that the respondent no.2 has also admitted the nature of business. That, the applicant was sufficiently interrogated by the DRI and yet no complaint is registered against the applicant. That, this is a fit case to exercise the power under Section 438 of the Code. In support of his arguments, learned advocate for the applicant has relied upon the judgment in the case of Siddharam Satlingppa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, 2011(1) SCC 694. Ultimately, it was requested by him to allow this application. From the other side, learned advocate for the respondent no.2 has strongly opposed the arguments advanced by learned advocate for the applicant and submitted that it is a premature application preferred by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o arrest the person without issuing notice to them. Considering the facts of the case, learned advocate for the respondent no.2 has requested to dismiss the present application as this is a premature at this stage. Learned APP for the respondent State has supported the arguments advanced by learned advocate for the respondent no.2. Having heard learned advocates for the respective parties and considering the controversy raised in the matter and proceedings against the present applicant, it appears that M/s. PVD Enterprise imported 211 numbers of Used Foreign Origin Printing Machine for repairing and refurbishing. 114 numbers were imported vide Bill of Entry No.4361330 dated 05.08.2019 and 97 numbers were imported for which they filed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....otice to them". The Hon'ble Apex Court held that neither of the above directions can be said to be legal, valid or in consonance with law. The order of the High Court was a blanket one as held by the Constitution Bench of Apex Court in Gurbaksh Singh and seeks to grant protection to the respondents in respect of any nonbailable offence. It is further held that it would be illegally obstruction, interference and curtail the authority of Custom Officer from exercising statutory power of arrest a person said to have committed a nonbailable offence by imposing a condition of giving 10 days prior notice, a condition not warranted by law. The order of the High Court to the extent of direction issued to the concerned authorities was set aside by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the authorities. It is keeping in view these considerations that we have to decide correctness or otherwise of the directions issued by a single Judge of the High Court. 'Blanket' order of bail may amount to or result in an invitation to commit an offence or a passport to carry on criminal activities or to afford a shield against any and all types of illegal operations, which, in our judgment, can never be allowed in a society governed by Rule of Law." The Hon'ble Apex Court, in the case of Siddharam Satlingppa Mhetre (supra), has held that under Section 438 of the Code, it is not extraordinary in the sense that it should be invoked only in exceptional or rare cases. A great ignominy, humiliation and disgrace are attached to arrest. ....