TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1987 (5) TMI 382
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....E.S. Venkataramiah and Ranganath Misra, JJ. ORDER R.S. Pathak, C.J.I. 1. In these petitions for review the learned Attorney General of India urges that certain observations and conclusions expressed in the individual Judgments of Bhagwati, CJI and one of us (Ranganath Misra, J) appear to conflict with each other and prays that clarification be made. In the first place, he has drawn our attentio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....alternative. Having considered the matter carefully, we are of opinion that in the case of recruitment to the Central Administrative Tribunal the appropriate course would be to appoint a High Powered Selection Committee headed by a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court to be nominated by the Chief Justice of India, while in the case of recruitment to the State Administrative Tribunals, the High Power....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....icial Duties but the Administrative functions which a High Court Judge is expected to discharge. Secondly, whether an Advocate applying for recruitment to the Administrative Tribunal has sufficient administrative potential can be examined and Judged during the process of selection. We, therefore, do not propose to interfere with the observations made by Bhagwati, CJI in his Judgment. 3. The Learn....