Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (9) TMI 582

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on freight amounting to Rs. 3,51,199/- for the period prior to 30.06.2017. The appellant in response to the audit objection deposited the amount on 09.03.2018 vide service tax challan Rs. 3,76,284/- (including cess) plus Rs. 41,599/- towards interest. 3. On being advised that as the appellant has already paid customs duty, CVD etc. on the import price which includes freight, the appellant was not required to pay service tax again on the freight (under reverse charge). Accordingly, appellant filed the refund application on 06.04.2018, praying for refund of the amount of tax with interest paid. 4. Show cause notice dated 11.06.2018 was issued as the appellant deposited the tax with interest towards settlement of audit para and further the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in non taxable territory to a person located in taxable territory, by way of transportation of goods from a place outside India upto customs station in India. It was further observed vide Notification No. 3/2017 read with Notification No. 15/2017, importer was liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism, by amending Notification No. 30/2012-ST. The tax deposited related to the period April, 2017 to June, 2017. It is further observed, that the appellant while admitting liability to service tax, have preferred the refund claim, only on the ground that cenvat credit is not available to them, in view of the provisions of Section 142(8) of CGST Act, 2017. It is further observed that the appellant have not submitted supporting docu....