Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (9) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....du Value Added Tax, 2006 [hereinafter referred to as "TNVAT Act" in short]. 3.The petitioner was originally assessed under the self assessment basis under Section 22(2) of the TNVAT Act by accepting the returns. Subsequently, it seems that at verification of returns, based on certain defects, the respondent had issued a notice dated 17.05.2018 stating certain reasons. Pursuant to the notice, the petitioner had given a reply on 26.05.2018 putting forth the defence to be taken in that regard. 4.However, the respondent, by order dated 19.12.2018 having rejected the said defence or reply given on behalf of the assessee/petitioner has passed an order, thereby making a demand to pay the additional tax under the TNVAT Act. 5.In this conte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsider the representation of the petitioner under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act and decide the same, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a timeframe that may be stipulated by this Court. 9.Heard Mr.R.Sureshkumar, learned Government Advocate (Civil) appearing for the respondent, who on the other hand would submit that as against the order passed by the assessing authority, the petitioner has got an appeal remedy under the provisions of the TNVAT Act, which should be filed within thirty days time. Within the said time of limitation, no appeal seems to have been filed by the petitioner and in order to overcome such non-filing of the appeal within the time, the petitioner has moved this application seeking the r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecord, within five years period from the date of original order. 14.Whether any error apparent on the face of the record or not has to be decided only by the assessing authority and in this regard, whatever be the details given by the assessee shall be taken into account by the assessing authority and decide the same on merits. 15.In this context, since Sub-Section (4) of Section 84 of the TNVAT Act has made it clear that even if the appeal / revision has been filed or pending, that will not preclude the power vested in the assessing authority to decide any such application be moved by the assessee to be considered under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act. 16.Therefore, the objection raised by the learned Government Advocate appearing for....