2017 (1) TMI 1761

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rawala and Mr. Karan Luthra, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for Respondent No. 2. ORDER CM Nos.3142-43/2017 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications stand disposed off. W.P.(C) 686/2017 3. Issue notice. Mr.Asheesh Jain, Advocate accepts notice for respondent N....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vy - by virtue of Section 115QA (1) and (2) of the Act is confined to, what is defined as 'buy-back' under Explanation (i) to Section 115QA (1). Elaborating on this, it is argued that non obstante clause, which changed the definition as well as the charging provision under Section 115QA, confines the levy only to transactions that are covered by it. The solitary nature of the transactions covered ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 434 of 2014, decided by the Bombay High Court on 28.04.2015). 9. Learned counsel for the Revenue, appearing on advance notice, has opposed the petition on the ground of the interim relief arguing that an alternative remedy under Section 250 is available. It is submitted that though the levy, is a special one, forms part of the Income Tax Act and, therefore, the AO's order is appealable. It is ar....