Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (3) TMI 1248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he interest income from fixed deposit of Rs. 20,37,345/-. According to the assessee, even if the interest income from Fixed Deposit does not qualify for the deduction u/s 80IC, still it being a business receipt should be given the benefit of netting. 3. The Ld. A.R Shri S. Jhajharia, FCA submitted that the revised ground no. 2 in respect of interest income survives and according to him only the net interest (i.e. interest income- interest paid-expenses) be taken out of the deduction u/s 80IC. According to Ld. A.R, the interest receipt from FD was business income, because the FD's were maintained in the bank for the purpose of issue of bank guarantee which were in-turn required for purchase of raw material from M/s SAIL. In order to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....given to assessee. 4. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, we are not repeating the same again for the sake of brevity. We note that in the revenue appeal for the same assessment year i.e. AY 2014-15 we have confirmed the action of Ld. CIT(A) in respect of claim of the assessee in respect of interest income as not eligible for deduction u/s 80IC wherein we held as under: "3. Aggrieved the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who in respect of the AO's action disallowing interest income of Rs. 20,37,345/- has held as under: "In view of the above discussion and respectively following the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of Reckitt Benckiser (India) Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income ....