Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2019 (6) TMI 1633

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the suo motto disallowance of Rs. 52,59,412/- u/s 14A and Rs. 16,51,834/- u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D(iii) of the IT Act 1961. 2. That the ld CIT(A) has erred in law and facts in directing the AO to reduce the total income by Rs. 52,59,412/- despite the fact that assessee did not file revised return of income." 3. Learned representatives fairly agree, even as learned Departmental Representative dutifully relied upon the stand of the Assessing Officer, that the issue is now covered, in favour of the assessee, by a coordinate bench decision in the case of DCIT vs. Greenland Infracon Pvt Ltd (ITA No.2039 & 2040/Ahd/2016; order dated 14.11.2008) wherein the bench has, inter alia, observed as follows....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....empt income earned by the assessee as is the case in the present appeals. Hon'ble Delhi High Court in PCIT vs IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd. (2017) 84 Taxman.com 186(Delhi) and the Hon'ble Madras High Court in CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Limited (2017) 80 taxmann.com 221(Madras) have expressed a clear disagreement with CBDT Circular and held that where there is no exempt income in relevant year there cannot be a disallowance of expenditure under s.14A of the Act. Similar proposition has been laid down by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd (2014) 45 taxmann.com. 116 (Guj) and Pr.CIT vs. India Gelatine and Chemicals Ltd. (2016) 66 taxmann.com 356 (Guj). The aforesaid judicial fiat was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eiterate the findings of the CIT(A). However, we fully endorse the observations of the CIT(A) which essentially holds that the mistake or inadvertence on the part of the assessee whereby an income not taxable has been wrongly offered for tax, will not operate as any kind of estoppel against the assessee and regardless of whether the revised return was filed or not. Once the assessee is in a position to show that it has been over assessed under the provisions of the Act even on account of assessee's own mistake or otherwise, the Revenue is under duty to assess correct income. 9. It is trite that the authorities under the Act are under sacrosanct obligation to act in accordance with law. Tax can be collected only as provided under the A....