Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (9) TMI 1221

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y of this appeal, the Assessing Officer has called into question correctness of CIT(A)'s order dated 14th January, 2010, in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) of the Income tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2004-05. 2. Ground No.1 reads as under: "1. The ld CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition on account of transfer fees of ₹ 13,27,500 and ₹ 2,63,333 following the d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tive Society Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer. 320 ITR 414(Bom). We also find that the CIT(A) has followed the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Shyam CHS and Suprabhat, CHS(supra) for allowing the transfer fees claimed by the assessee. We, therefore, uphold the grievance of the assessee and approve the stand taken by the CIT(A). 4. Ground No. 1 is dismissed. 5. In ground No.2,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CIT(A) has deleted the addition following the various decisions of the Tribunal, we decline to interfere and uphold the same. 7. Ground No.2 is thus dismissed. 8. Ground No.3 reads as under: "The ld CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of ₹ 4,09,461 on account of interest received from bank following the decision of Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT in the case of ITO vs. Sagar Sanjog CHS ltd wherein....