Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (8) TMI 859

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rounds before us: "(1.a) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. CIT[A), having allowed certain relief, erred in confirming the addition to the extent of Rs. 7,95,773/- made by the AO to the income of the Appellant on account of possible profit element to the extent of 3% embedded in purchases made from alleged non-genuine parties on the basis of information received from DGlT(Inv.) Wing, Mumbai. (b) The Id, CIT(A) failed to appreciate that :- (i) all the purchases are genuine beyond doubt and supported by sufficient materials; (ii) every purchase is backed by corresponding sale; (iii) the gross profit ratio shown by the Appellant is quite reasonable; (iv) t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...." 2. Briefly stated, the assessee firm which is engaged in the business of trading in polished diamonds had filed its return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 on 21.09.2013, declaring an income of Rs. 10,37,450/-. The return of income filed by the assessee firm was initially processed as such u/s 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case of the assessee firm was selected for scrutiny assessment u/s 143(2) of the Act. 3. During the course of the assessment proceeding, the A.O was in receipt of information from the DGIT(Inv.), Mumbai, wherein it was conveyed that search and seizure proceedings conducted on Shri Bhanwarlal Jain and his group concerns had revealed that the assessee as a beneficiary had obtained accommodation entries of bogus pur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....counted value from the open/grey market. Accordingly, in the backdrop of his aforesaid deliberations, the A.O held a conviction that the addition qua the impugned purchases was liable to be restricted only to the extent of the profit which the assessee would had made by procuring the goods in question at a discounted value from the open/grey market. Quantifying the said profit element @ 8% of the value of the impugned purchases of Rs. 2,65,25,767/-, the A.O made an addition of Rs. 21,22,061/- in the hands of the assessee. 4. On appeal, the CIT(A) observing that the net profit in diamond manufacturing was in the range of 1.5% to 4.5%, while for that in diamond trading was in the range of 1% to 3%, therefore, scaled down the addition to 3%....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he genuineness and veracity of the purchases that were made by the assessee from the aforementioned parties, the "affidavits" of both of the aforesaid supplier parties were furnished with the A.O. Our attention was drawn by the ld. A.R to the "affidavits" of the proprietor/partner of the aforesaid parties, viz. (i). M/s Mohit Enterprises; and (ii) M/s Prime Star, at Page Nos. 137 -140 of the APB. It was submitted by the ld. A.R that now when the assessee had substantiated to the hilt the authenticity of the purchases made from the aforementioned parties, therefore, there was no justification on the part of the lower authorities to have made/sustained any part of the disallowance qua the purchases in question. In order to buttress his afores....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri Bhanwarlal Jain and his associates concerns revealed, that the assessee as a beneficiary had obtained certain accommodation/bogus purchase bills. On a perusal of the assessment order, we find that the A.O had dedicated his entire efforts towards demonstrating at length the modus operandi that was generally adopted by accommodation entry providers a/w the facts attending to their dummy businesses. As observed by us hereinabove, the assessee in the course of the assessment proceedings had furnished supporting documentary evidence to substantiate the authenticity of the purchases claimed to have been made from the aforementioned parties. Nowhere in the assessment order, the A.O had arrived at an observation that the assessee had failed to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and declare that my firm have sold 1346.17 carats of cut and polished diamonds for Rs. 2,17,31,189/- including VAT during the F.Y.2012-13 to M/s Creative International, 301, Panchratna, Opera House, Mumbai 400004, details of which are as under: - Sr. No. Date Bill No. Carats Amount (Rs.) 1. 02.04.2012 PS/PD/APR/05/2012-13 305.56 51,60,071/- 2. 13.04.2012 PS/PD/APR/21/2012-13 295.68 32,62,607/- 3. 03.08.2012 PS/PD/AUG/05/2012-13 310.61 67,91,954/- 4. 08.11.2012 PS/PD/NOV/09/2012-13 318.76 48,53,360/- 5. 15.01.2013 PS/PD/JAN/12/2012-13 115.56 16,63,197/-" On a perusal of the aforesaid, we find that complete details as regards the sales carried out by....