Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (8) TMI 593

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order or direction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, calling for records of petitioner's case so far as related to the adjustment of refund against outstanding demand for A.Y. 2019-20. Petitioner says respondent is yet to refund a sum of Rs. 37,63,57,620/- for A.Y. 2019-20 alongwith applicable statutory interest under Section 244 (A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). 3. According to petitioner, for the assessment year 2019-20, respondent had to refund a sum of Rs. 44,24,54,040/- as per the intimation dated 17th March, 2020 under Section 143 (1) of the Act. Thereafter, petitioner received a communication dated 13th May, 2020 being intimation under Section 245 of the Act from the Centralized Processing Center, Inc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplications were also filed and orders have been stayed upon petitioner depositing 20% of the demand amounts. The fact of petitioner depositing 20% has not been disputed though Mr. Walve states that extension to deposit 20% for A.Y. 2016-17 was not granted but petitioner still went ahead and deposited it. In our view that should not really matter because 20% has been deposited and respondents have accepted the same. The stay for both A.Y. 2015-16 and 2016-17 have to be in force. 5. Mr. Pardiwalla submitted that before any adjustment is made, it is mandatory to give intimation under Section 245 of the Act to the person to whom the refund is due of the proposed action. In this case, admittedly, and we say admittedly because the affidavit in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ble was initiated on 17th March, 2020 but due to technical error, the intimation got stuck and could not be delivered to the assessee's registered E-mail id. Mr. Walve submitted that on 13th May, 2020 technical error got rectified in CPC portal and intimation under Section 245 of the Act was sent to the assessee. 7. For ease of reference, we shall quote Section 245 of the Act, which read as under ; 245. Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable 2 Where under any of the provisions of this Act, a refund is found to be due to any person, the [Assessing] Officer, Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)],Commissioner (Appeals)] or Chief Commissioner or Commissioner], as the case may be, may, in lieu of payment of the refund, set off the amount t....