TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (6) TMI 1422
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....an, Senior Standing Counsel for IT. For the Respondent : No appearance. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by D. Krishnakumar, J) This Writ Appeal has been preferred against the Order dated 15.9.2010 passed in W.P. No. 20525 of 2010 by a learned single Judge of this Court. 2. The facts of the case are as follows:- The respondent was an employee of M/s. Infosys Technology Ltd., C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....and remittance towards tax. Subsequently, the respondent filed a revised return on 11.2.2003 and also filed a petition on 11.2.2003 before the first respondent for refunding the TDS amount along with interest along with a request to condone the delay in filing the returns. However, such request was rejected by the first respondent vide Proceedings dated 14.07.2009. Challenging the said proceedings....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ovisions of the Act within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. 4. It is not disputed by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant that the instant Writ Appeal also stands on the same footing and the Writ Appeal is covered by the said decisions. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and following the aforesaid decision of....