Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (1) TMI 1489

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reinafter referred to as "the Act") dated 08/12/2017 relevant to Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- 1.01. That Learned CIT(Appeal)-6, Ahmedabad has erred in confirming disallowance u/s.54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Rs. 64,22,882/-. 1.02. That various reasons advanced by Learned CIT(Appeal)-6 Ahmedabad while confirming disallowance of claim are contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case. 1.03. Therefore disallowance of Rs. 64,22,882/- u/s.54F of the Income Tax Act5, 1961 confirmed by Learned CIT(Appeal)-9, Ahmedabad deserves to be deleted. 2.00 The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, edit, delete, modify any of the grounds of appeal at the time of or before ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....galows are in the same society, adjacent to each other. As such both the bungalows are one unit for the residential purposes. Therefore, he claimed that he is entitled for the deduction/ exemption for both the bungalows under section 54F of the Act. 5.1. However, the learned CIT(A) observed that there is an amendment under the provisions of section 54F of the Act where the expression previously used "a residential house" has been substituted with one residential house. Such amendment is effective with effect from assessment year 2015-16 i.e. the year under consideration. Accordingly the learned CIT(A) rejected the contention of the assessee and confirmed the order of the AO. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT (A) the assessee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the area of the residential property. It means, one assessee can buy huge bungalow/property say thousand square meters and can claim the deduction subject to the conditions. Similarly, the other assessee on the other hand acquired two different residential properties adjacent to each other but both the properties put together has only two hundred square meters but he will be extended the benefit of the exemption with respect to one unit only because of the reason that there are two different properties based on registry documents. 7.2. There can be a situation that the family of the assessee is quite large, comprising of several members in the family and therefore he needs two properties adjacent to each other to accommodate his family mem....