Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (8) TMI 245

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o.H-28A/2019 by the Additional District Judge, Bhatapara, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.), whereby the learned Additional District Judge allowed the appeal filed by respondent No.1./plaintif arising out of order dated 22.02.2019 passed in Civil Suit No.6-A/2019 by Civil Judge Class-II, Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara and remitted the case to Civil Judge Class-II, Simga. 3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that a civil suit was filed by the respondent No.1 against the appellants/defendants and State before the Civil Judge Class-II for declaration of title, permanent injunction and separation of possession as per partition. The plaint was filed with injunction application and application under Section 151 of the Code of Civi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....munnisa Vs. Malan Bi (dead) by Legal Representatives and Another reported in (2016) 10 SCC 315. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondents supported the impugned judgment and order. Learned counsel for respondent No.1, referring the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Pawan Kumar Vs. Babulal since Deceased Through Legal Representatives and Others reported in (2019) 4 SCC 367, submits that application for rejection of plaint on the ground of being barred by law in the Act and from the statement in the plaint it appears without doubt or dispute that suit is saved by Section 4 (3) (b) of the Act, such disputed question of fact has to be adjudicated on basis of evidence and cannot be decided at the stage of consid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a Hindu undivided family and the property is held for the benefit of the coparceners in the family; or (b) where the person in whose name the property is held is a trustee or other person standing in a fiduciary capacity, and the property is held for the benefit of another person for whom he is a trustee or towards whom he stands in such capacity." 8. It is clear from Sub-Section 3 to Section 4 (a) of the Act which deals with acquisitions by and in the name of a coparcener in a Hindu undivided family or the benefit of such coparceners in the family and Section 4(3)(b) of the Act deals with the trustee and the beneficiaries thereof and the other that deals with the persons standing in a fiduciary capacity and those towards whom he stands....