2020 (6) TMI 763

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at for R2-4 holding 75% shareholding, they unfairly issued notice for increase of authorized share capital from Rs. 10,01 Crore to Rs. 11.01 Crore, subsequent to the increase of authorised capital, the Respondents again on 05.06.2020 issued another notice after filing this company petition to raise paid up capital on issual of rights issue for two lac shares of Rs. 10 each, out of those two lac shares, the petitioners together are offered fifty thousand shares of Rs. 10 each on pro rata basis. If the petitioners do not subscribe to the same, the equity shareholding of the petitioners would ultimately dilute from 25% to decimally low. To which, the Respondents have not shown any palpable reason for increase of paid capital through rights iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ies. Answering it, the respondents' counsel has stated all these monies have been given to the suppliers, at some points of time, wherever extra money has gone to the suppliers that is shown as monies receivables to the company wherever less money has gone, there it has been shown as payables to the suppliers. Of course, both the sides have not agreed on this point. For because the petitioners saying these monies are not given to the suppliers/trade creditors, the respondents' side saying that all these transactions are in relation to discharging the functions of the company, we are of the view that it is a point for determination, therefore this Bench cannot say anything unless an affidavit comes from the respondents' side. If ....