TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (8) TMI 59
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Officer for Rs. 10375360/-, although the AO has many technical faults in the assessment made and also have not given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The Worth CIT(A) further erred in confirming the excess of receipt over expenditure as Income from business, if the society does not have any business. 3. That the Learned CIT(A) has further erred in confirming the above addition of Rs. 10375360/-not considering the claim for exemption u/s 10(23C) and under section 11 of the Act. So, the addition made needs to be deleted. 4. That the Learned CIT(A) has further erred in confirming the initiation of the penalty proceedings by the AO under Section 271 (1)c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has further erred in confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer without giving the reasonable opportunity to be heard to the assessee. 6. That it is prayed that the order of the Assessing Officer and Worthy Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal may be vacated and the original assessment at Rs. NIL under section 143(1) may please be restored. 7. That the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er no. CIT- 1/ASR/ITO(Tech)/2009-10/2798 dt. 25.09.2009 by Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar from the Assessment Year 2009-10. 6. That AO initiated proceedings u/s 148 vide notice dated 26.3.2014 on the ground that assesee's income was not exempt u/s 10(23C)(vi) as per the order of CIT. The reasons for reopening are as under : "During the course of the assessment proceedings of Shree Wishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society, Batala for the Asstt. Year 2008-09. The assessing officer has observed that the assessee trust has been claiming tax exemption 10(23C)(vi) without getting any approval from the worth Chief Commissioner of Income tax, Amritsar and also without getting itself registered u/s 12AA of the Income tax Act, 1961 with the Commissioner of Income tax-I, Amritsar. As such the assessee has regularly not been paying tax on the income chargeable to tax. During the period relevant to the Asstt. Year 2007-08 the assessee has shown excess of income over expenditure amount to Rs. 10375360/-which was chargeable to tax but assessee has claimed it exempted income u/s 10(23C)(vi) without getting any approval under this section and without getting r....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year: Provided further that no action under section 147 shall be taken by the Assessing Officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year: Provided also that provisions contained in the first and second proviso shall not apply in case of any trust or institution which was refused registration or the registration granted to it was cancelled at any time under section 12AA." The copy of relevant portion of Finance Act, 2014 and the relevant portion of circular containing the Memorandum for explaining the provisions in The Finance Act (No. 2) Bill, 2014 is enclosed herewith. In the above provisions, it is crystal clear that no action u/s 147 can be taken by the assessing officer in any proceeding assessment year in case of the institution has granted the registration u/s 12AA for any subsequent assessment year only for non registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year. In the case of the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he assessment order does not mention whether the AO replied to the objection of the appellant to reopen the assessment u/s 147 of the Act vide his letter dated 23.2.2015" 13. In view of the above submissions it was submitted that order u/s 147 framed is void abinitio hence null and void. Being a clear case of violation of law as laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case cited supra. 14. Per contra DR for the revenue had submitted in the written statement that "The appellant has also argued that its objections to reopening of assessment have not been considered by the AO by passing speaking order. In this regard, it is submitted that the objections to reopening filed by appellant vide letter dated 05.02.2015 and same objections raised again vide letter dated 23.02.2015 stood rejected by the AO vide letter dated 11.02.2015 and only thereafter the AO had proceeded to pass the assessment order u/s. 147/ 143(3) of the Act Further, reliance is placed upon the judgment Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Sunil Bhaseen vs Commissioner of Income Tax in IT Appeal No. 411 of 2008 (28.11.2008) 18 DTR 0201 (2009) wherein the Hon'ble Jurisdiction....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eded to pass the impugned assessment order u/s 147 / 143(3) of the Act. However, the AO had only erred in not passing a speaking order against the objections raised by the appellant to reopening the assessment u/s 147 of the Act which he was bound to do in accordance with the said decision of the hon'ble Supreme court of India in the case of GKN Driveshaft (India)." 16. In the light of the categorical finding by the Commissioner appeal at the time of dealing with the objection and more particularly, when the assessing officer has dispose of the objection of the assessee vide order dated 11 February 2015 and also in the light of the judgement relied upon by the revenue in the case of Sunil Bhaseen vs Commissioner of Income Tax in IT Appeal No. 411 of 2008 (28.11.2008) 18 DTR 0201 (2009), we are of the opinion that the ground raised by the assessee is devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed and we accordingly dismiss the same. 17. 2nd point charged by the assessee before us was the assesee's case was fully covered by amended provisions of section 12A as reproduced above on account of addition of proviso to section 12A(2). 18. In support of the 2nd poin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....- "The appellant was taking shelter under the amended provisions of section 12AA of the Act which are effected from 01.10.2014 whereas assessment proceedings were reopened on 26.03.2014 and the notice u/s. 148 was served upon assessee on the same date ie. prior to amended provisions of section 12AA of the Act. The appellant has been granted registration u/s. 12A on 24.09.2009 by the CIT-I Amritsar and no proceedings u/s. 147 of the Act for AY.2007-08 were pending before the AO on the date of such registration i.e 24.09.2009 accordingly the first proviso of said amendment in section 12A of the Act applicable w.e.f 01.10.2014 was not applicable in the case of the appellant." 25. We have heard the rival contentions of the parties and perused the material on record. By the finance Act Finance Act, 2014, the section 12A of The Income Tax Act has been amended with effect from 01.10.2014 and inserted the following clauses: "Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust or institution under section 12AA, then the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ere was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income Tax Act. For the above said purposes we may rely upon the decision of the coordinate bench in the matter of SHYAM MANDIR COMMITTEE, Jaipur v. ACIT, Sikar (supra) wherein one of the member(namely Judicial member) was a party, in the said decision it was held as under: "5.1. For the purpose of adjudicating the additional ground, it is necessary to reproduce section 12A of the IT Act, which provides as under :- " 12A. Conditions for applicability of sections 11 & 12. (1) The provisions of section 11 and section 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the following conditions are fulfilled, namely :- (a) The person in receipt of the income has made an application for registration of the trust or institution in the prescribed form and in the prescribed manner to the Commissioner before the 1 st day of July, 1973, or befor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... section 12A first proviso, second proviso and third proviso for the sake of clarity. [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust or institution under section 12AA, then, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the Assessing Officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year. Provided further that no action under section 147 shall be taken by the Assessing Officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year: Provided also that provisions contained in the first and second proviso shall not apply in case of any trust or institution which was refused registration or the registration granted to it was cancelled at any time under section 12AA.]" A bare reading of the proviso clearly provides that if at the time of grant of registrat....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the Assessing Officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment year. Provided further that no action under section 147 shall be taken by the Assessing Officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year: Provided also that provisions contained in the first and second proviso shall not apply in case of any trust or institution which was refused registration or the registration granted to it was cancelled at any time under section 12AA.]" We have gone through the provisions of the Act and have also gone through the record. In our view, the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 12A has retrospective application and has been inserted in the Act to remove the hardship of the charitable trusts/institutions. Admittedly, in the present case when the registration was granted on 05.03.2010 with effect from 01.04.2008, the assessment proceedings for 2007-08 were pending ....