Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (7) TMI 1135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ious concerns. In case of assessee itself volume of issuing bogus bills is to the tune of more than Rs. 100 crores. It is alleged that this group is maintaining not one but nine other such entities who are engaged in providing bogus bills. Detailed statements were recorded of all the persons, large number of bank accounts were verified and date are tabulated which shows that it was a racket created by few persons wherein bogus entities were created for supplying bogus bills of steel to a large number of beneficiaries. Assessee is actively involved in this money laundering racket of providing accommodation entries. 03. The ld. CIT(Appeals), however, directed the ld. Assessing Officer to take action under Section 147 / 148 of the Act. Further As the ld. CIT (Appeals) allowed the appeal of the assessee by quashing the order under Section 153C of the Act, he did not adjudicate on the other grounds of appeal such as merits of the addition. The ld. CIT (Appeals) held that as the proceedings under Section 153C of the act stand quashed the other grounds of appeal on merits of the addition do not survive for adjudication and the same are dismissed without adjudicating them on merits. Thu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee. She found that in the present proceedings the correct action to be initiated by the ld. Assessing Officer is re-opening of the assessment and, therefore, the CIT (Appeals) has correctly given the direction to initiate proceedings under Section 147 / 148 of the Act. She further referred to the large number of decisions of the various courts to support her contentions. 07. We have carefully considered the contentions raised by the ld. [CIT] - DR as well as the grounds raised by the assessee and the orders of the lower authorities. We have also considered the judgements relied upon by the learned CIT DR about the powers of the CIT - A for giving such direction. We find that assessment orders were passed under Section 153C of the Act wherein search was conducted and bank account of the assessee was found and therefore notice under Section 153A of the Act was issued to the assessee. Consequently the assessment was framed and an addition of Rs. 26,56,06,067/- was made in case of the assessee on protective basis. It is to be noted that this addition has been made on account of cash deposits in various bank accounts held by M/s. Rishav Trading Company, whose proprietor was Mr.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peals)being conscious of his powers and his authority in directing the ld. Assessing Officer to issue notice under Section 147 / 148 of the Act. No doubt the action of the ld. Assessing Officer would always be tested on the parameters of Section 147 & 148 of the Act. The assessee would also be granted proper opportunity of hearing and objecting to such action of the learned assessing officer. The provisions of Section 116 of the income Tax Act clearly defines authority where the CIT (Appeals) is also mentioned. The powers of the CIT (Appeals) are enumerated under Section 251 on the Income Tax Act. The direction of the ld. CIT (Appeals) does not prejudice the assessee if the ld. Assessing Officer issue notices after following the provisions of law and giving an opportunity of hearing to the assessee under Section 148 of the Act. It is to be noted that CIT (Appeals) has not enhanced the income of the assessee. However, in fact he has given relief to the assessee. When at the time of giving relief, the CIT (Appeals) in the peculiar circumstances of the facts of the case has clearly seen that the case of the assessee should be covered under the provisions of Section 147 of the Act; ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....consider the issues Suo Moto and deal with all points and grounds which arises from not merely the subject matter of the appeal but even from the larger area of the subject matter of assessment. Such is the mandate of the honourable Gujarat High Court in 206 ITR 574. 12. The learned CIT appeal is a superior authority then the learned assessing officer and he can give any direction on the facts and circumstances of the case and in light of the provisions of the act. If the assessing officer or the assessee has any grievance the provisions are already there to file an appeal before the ITAT. But the first appellate authority has every right to correct the mistakes in the order of the assessing officer and he can give any directions in conformity with the provisions of the act. In fact it does not curtail the powers of the assessing officer but in fact it is in the conformity of the provisions of the act and guides the assessing officer for proper administration of the act. Such is the mandate of the honourable Rajasthan High Court in CIT versus Jewels emporium 257 ITR 736. 13. Further as the learned CIT - A has merely gave a direction to the assessing officer , challenging the ....