2021 (7) TMI 695

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Act; as also the Penalty Notice(s) dated 14.11.2019 under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) and Section 274 read with Section 271F of the Act. 2. The above-mentioned Impugned Notices and the Assessment Order have been issued / passed by the respondents in the name of Late Shri Sripathi Subbaraya Gupta - the Assessee and relate to the Assessment Year 2012-13. 3. It is the case of the petitioner, that Late Shri Gupta had, however, expired on 17.06.2014 and in support of this submission, the petitioner has placed on record the Death Certificate of Late Shri Gupta issued by the Department of Public Health, Corporation of Chennai. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that she was not aware of the above proceedings emanating from t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Act and Impugned Notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee, after getting the prior approval of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. As the assessee failed to file the return of income, further Notices were issued to the assessee and as no explanation was received from the assessee, the Impugned Assessment Order dated 14.12.2019 was passed. He submits that the Assessing Officer was not aware and had no knowledge about the demise of the assessee as in spite of issuance of various Notices to the petitioner, the same was not informed to the Assessing Officer by the petitioner. 8. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties. 9. The objections raised by the learned counsel for the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ON. CONSEQUENTLY, THE JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENT UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT, 1961 OF SERVICE OF NOTICE WAS NOT FULFILLED IN THE PRESENT INSTANCE. xxxxx 26. In the opinion of this Court the issuance of a notice under Section 148 of the Act is the foundation for reopening of an assessment. Consequently, the sine qua non for acquiring jurisdiction to reopen an assessment is that such notice should be issued in the name of the correct person. This requirement of issuing notice to a correct person and not to a dead person is not merely a procedural requirement but is a condition precedent to the impugned notice being valid in law. [See Sumit Balkrishna Gupta v. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(2), Mumbai & Ors., (2019) 2 TMI 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....018 (6) TMI 760 - Madras High Court] it has been held "nothing has been placed before this Court by the Revenue to show that there is a statutory obligation on the part of the legal representatives of the deceased assessee to immediately intimate the death of the assessee or take steps to cancel the PAN registration." xxxxx 34. Consequently, the legal heirs are under no statutory obligation to intimate the death of the assessee to the Revenue. SECTION 292B OF THE ACT, 1961 HAS BEEN HELD TO BE INAPPLICABLE, VIS-À-VIS, NOTICE ISSUED TO A DEAD PERSON IN RAJENDER KUMAR SEHGAL [2018 (12) TMI 697 (DELHI)], CHANDRESHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI PATEL [2019 (1) TMI 353 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] AND ALAMELU VEERAPPAN [2018 (6) TMI 760 - MADRAS HIGH COURT....