2021 (7) TMI 422
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Advocate. ORDER MANMOHAN, J. (Oral) 1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 11th May 2021 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in OA No.871/2021. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent was posted as Superintendent (Jewe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bmits that the Tribunal erred in holding that the suspension was resorted to in contemplation of disciplinary proceedings and that there was no reference to any criminal case, much less, to the factum of arrest. He submits that the Tribunal failed to appreciate that the initial order of suspension was issued on 03rd June 2019, i.e. only after the arrest of the respondent on 31st May, 2019. 6. L....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nal that since the applicant/applicant has now to be paid subsistence allowance equivalent to his salary, it would serve no purpose not to utilise his services. 8. Accordingly, this Court finds no ground to interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction and the present writ petition along with pending applications is dismissed. 9. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, on....
TaxTMI