Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (6) TMI 954

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned Judicial Magistrate has dismissed the Crl.M.P. No. 1850 of 2016 vide the order impugned, dated 27.07.2016. Therefore, she has preferred the instant criminal revision case. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reasons assigned by the Court below in dismissing the private complaint by the petitioner is against law, weight of evidence and probabilities of the case. He further submitted that the facts as adduced in the private complaint have made out the offences, but the Court below failed to allow the same and consequently dismissed the private complaint. He further submitted that the offences committed by the respondents 1 & 2 would squarely come under the ambit of various offences. He further submitted that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... since it is not in good condition. The 1st respondent herein refused and filled the cheque for Rs. 2 Lakhs through the 2nd respondent and the same was presented for collection. The cheque was returned by the Bank. The 2nd respondent filed a criminal case against this petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. When the 1st respondent refused to return the advance amount the petitioner had preferred a complaint to the Inspector of Police, Ambasamuthiram Police Station, through a registered post on 16.12.2015. The Inspector of Police did not proceed the case further. Therefore, the petitioner gave a another complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District on 26.12.2015. He also did not take any further action. ....