Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (6) TMI 783

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to manufacturing, and have later transferred the credit to the Respondents, who purchased the material. A Show Cause Notice was issued alleging that the Respondents were aware of the fact that their supplier ceased to be a manufacturer. The Show Cause Notice was decided in favour of the respondents by the commissioner vide above cited order. Hence, Revenue is in Appeal. 2. Learned Authorised Representative reiterates the grounds of appeal and submits that • CESTAT, vide final order A/501-504/EB/C-II dated 05-07-2011, held that JK Files Thane Unit were correcting in reversing credit when the inputs were cleared after payment of duty and that such reversal amounted to reversal of Cenvat credit; the adjudicating authority erre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T280 (Tri-Mumbai) (ii). CCE, Raigarh Vs Micro Inks Ltd 2011(270) ELT 360(Bom) (iii). CCE-V Vs Micro Inks Ltd 2017(351) ELT A180 (SC) (iv). Gracim Industries Ltd Vs CCE, Indore 2003(155) ELT 200(Tri-Del) (v). Jai Balaji Industries Ltd VS CCGST&CE, Siliguri 2019(12) TMI 525 CESTAT Kolkata (vi). PSL Holdings Ltd Vs CCE, Rajkot 2003 (156) ELT 602 (Tr-Mum) (vii) CCE Vs Neuland Laboratories Ltd 2005(319) ELT A140(AP) (viii). CCE, Raigarh Vs Ispat Metallics India Ltd 2019(4) TMI 900 Bombay HC (ix). Kohinoor Printers Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, Pondicherry 2008(2) TMI 865 CESTAT, Chennai (x). Uttam Galva Steels Ltd Vs CCE, Raigarh 2005(12) TMI 254 CESTAT Mumbai (xi). Rama....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e essential conditions have been violated to deny the credit to the appellant. 5. The argument of the department is that their supplier was performing certain operations on the goods which are not in the nature of manufacture; they were not liable to pay duty; therefore, the appellants are not entitled to avail the credit. Commissioner relied upon CESTATs final order A/501- 504/EB/C-II dated 05-07-2011, where in it was held that JK Files Thane Unit the payment of duty with value addition on the inputs received by the appellants amounts to reversal of Cenvat Credit as demanded by the department. Department alleges that the CESTAT only said that the credit said to have been availed by the supplier was nullified by their duty payment and th....